When Do Entrepreneurs Exit Failing Ventures? Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials

dc.contributor.advisorParker, Simon C.
dc.contributor.authorYu, Naryoung
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-13T23:17:03Z
dc.date.available2025-08-13T23:17:03Z
dc.date.issued2025-05-28
dc.descriptionThis thesis is under embargo until February 13, 2026.
dc.description.abstractWhen does an entrepreneur concerned with financial performance decide to close a failing venture, and why? While much of the existing literature focuses on whether entrepreneurs exit, relatively little attention has been paid to the timing of exit, particularly under conditions of risk and uncertainty. Traditional economic models, such as expected utility theory (EUT), predict that entrepreneurs taking care of financial performance should maximize financial value when deciding to exit. However, this thesis challenges that assumption by examining how entrepreneurs make exit-timing decisions. This study employs an experimental approach to examine exit-timing behavior. An incentivized online experiment involving 422 adult participants, comprised of entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs, challenges the conventional wisdom that risk attitudes and optimism explain observed behavior. These insights contribute to ongoing debates in entrepreneurship and behavioral decision-making by uncovering cognitive mechanisms that shape exit decisions beyond financial optimization. I advance the research on exit-timing behavior by proposing a new, abductivelyderived theory of exit timing, called “Dual Threshold Theory,”(DTT). DTT matches important aspects of the data and appears to be a promising basis for future research in entrepreneurship and management. By shifting the focus from whether entrepreneurs exit to when they exit, this thesis contributes to research on entrepreneurial exit, decision-making under risk and uncertainty, and behavioral finance. The findings offer theoretical and practical implications for understanding how individuals abandon declining ventures. The theoretical contributions of this study extend beyond entrepreneurship, offering potential applications in strategic management, behavioral finance, and corporate decision-making, particularly in contexts where individuals must determine when to abandon declining projects.
dc.description.copyrightNaryoung Yu, 2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14721/38515
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThe University of Western Ontario
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.subjectdecision-making
dc.subjectrisk
dc.subjectuncertainty
dc.subjectoptimism
dc.subjectexperiment
dc.subjectexit timing
dc.titleWhen Do Entrepreneurs Exit Failing Ventures? Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials
dc.typethesis
oaire.license.conditionhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
thesis.degree.disciplineBusiness Administration
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Western Ontario
thesis.degree.namePh D
uwo.description.laySummaryWhen does an entrepreneur concerned with financial performance decide to close a failing venture, and why? While much of the existing research focuses on whether entrepreneurs shut down their businesses, relatively little attention has been paid to when they decide to do so, particularly in situations where future outcomes are uncertain but probabilities are known (i.e., risk) and where both outcomes and their likelihoods are unknown (i.e., uncertainty). Traditional economic models, such as expected utility theory (EUT), predict that financially motivated entrepreneurs should close their business at the point when they can get the most money out of it. However, this thesis challenges that assumption by examining how entrepreneurs make decisions regarding exit timing. This study employs an experimental approach to explore how people decide when to shut down a failing business. An incentivized online experiment involving 422 adult participants, comprised of entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs, challenges the conventional wisdom that risk attitudes and optimism explain exit behavior. These insights contribute to ongoing debates in entrepreneurship and behavioral decision-making (how people make important everyday choices) by uncovering cognitive mechanisms that shape exit decisions beyond the financially ideal moment. To explain these findings, I propose a new, abductively derived theory of exit timing, called “Dual Threshold Theory,” (DTT). DTT matches important aspects of the data and appears to be a promising basis for future research in entrepreneurship and management. By shifting the focus from whether entrepreneurs exit to when they exit, this thesis contributes to research on entrepreneurial exit, decision-making in risky and uncertain situations, and behavioral finance (the study of how psychological and emotional factors affect financial decisions). The findings offer theoretical and practical implications for understanding how individuals abandon declining ventures. The theoretical contributions of this study extend beyond entrepreneurship, offering potential applications in strategic management, behavioral finance, and corporate decision-making, particularly in contexts where individuals must determine when to abandon failing projects.

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Yu_Naryoung_PhD_2025_thesis.pdf
Size:
3.27 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.05 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections